Ética con IA: del soft law al control real por contrato y código

Edgar David Oliva Terán

doi:10.35319/lawreview.202618134

Autores/as

Edgar David Oliva Terán Investigador independiente https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1575-3474

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35319/lawreview.202618134

Palabras clave:

ética digital, inteligencia artificial, soft law, gobernanza algorítmica, regulación tecnológica

Resumen

El presente artículo tiene por objetivo analizar cómo la inteligencia artificial transforma la ética en una forma efectiva de regulación digital. Ante la ausencia de un marco normativo global, las plataformas incorporan principios morales en algoritmos, términos de servicio y arquitecturas técnicas, convirtiendo valores en mecanismos de control conductual y planteando la cuestión de qué moral es la que efectivamente gobierna la conducta de los usuarios. Mediante un enfoque teórico y jurídico-filosófico, basado en el análisis doctrinal y normativo del soft law, el derecho contractual y la gobernanza algorítmica, el presente artículo examina la transición del soft law hacia prácticas coercitivas de facto, donde el código y el contrato adquieren fuerza normativa. Finalmente, se propone un marco conceptual de gobernanza ética orientado a delimitar los actuales criterios de transparencia, proporcionalidad y revisión humana, contribuyendo al debate sobre ética, poder y regulación en la era algorítmica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Edgar David Oliva Terán, Investigador independiente

Investigador independiente basado en Santa Cruz – Bolivia.

Citas

Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300442515

Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477899

Ben-Shahar, O., & Schneider, C. E. (2010). The failure of mandated disclosure. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159(3), 647–749. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol159/iss3/2/

Brink, D. O. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624604

Buchanan, A. (2002). Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics, 112(4), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1086/340313

Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2006). The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics, 20(4), 405–437. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679400000207

Chouldechova, A. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data, 5(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0047

Fuller, L. L. (1964). The morality of law. Yale University Press.

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02413

Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford University Press. ISO/IEC. (2022).

Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Artificial intelligence concepts and terminology (ISO/IEC 22989:2022).

International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/74296.html

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554475

Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol165/iss3/3/

Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books.

Miller, A. (2013). Moral theory: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-1.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019).

Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/ LEGAL/0449). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449

Radin, M. J. (2013). Boilerplate: The fine print, vanishing rights, and the rule of law. Princeton University Press.

Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (Expanded ed.). Columbia University Press.

Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford University Press.

Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). (2024). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability in Content Moderation. (2021). New America. https://www.newamerica.org/oti/reports/santa-clara-principles-transparency-and-accountability-content-moderation/

Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and throughput. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x

Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defence. Oxford University Press.

Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002). https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/306/17/642323/

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108697841

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.